3 avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/9c31af6c5b4daa602dacb9d90274df38"
4 subject="re: bad graphs"
5 date="2014-04-09T11:09:55Z"
7 Right. So, it's not a bug in the data, but arguably a bug in how it is presented --- we can definitely do better on that front.
9 First of all, the 20-years data graphs are not meant to cover the historical evolution of Debian releases. Those data is currently available only at per-release pages.
11 The 20-years data are rather meant to cover the historical evolution of the sources.d.n dataset. We have only about 1 year of history, as sources.d.n didn't exist earlier on. That could be made clearer by having longer x-axes, going back 20 years; but the data would be invariably 0 for the years before 2013, so I'm not really sure what we will really gain by doing that.