Comment moderation
authorzack <zack@web>
Sat, 8 May 2010 07:20:22 +0000 (09:20 +0200)
committerStefano Zacchiroli <zack@upsilon.cc>
Sat, 8 May 2010 07:20:22 +0000 (09:20 +0200)
blog/posts/2010/02/integrating_Mutt_with_Org-mode/comment_1_2d6a157e1c67a4a05e7ea8521bc8f02f._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/blog/posts/2010/02/integrating_Mutt_with_Org-mode/comment_1_2d6a157e1c67a4a05e7ea8521bc8f02f._comment b/blog/posts/2010/02/integrating_Mutt_with_Org-mode/comment_1_2d6a157e1c67a4a05e7ea8521bc8f02f._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..a65fcf9
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="zack"
+ subject="org-mode and mutt"
+ date="2010-05-08T07:19:57Z"
+ content="""
+thanks for your post [0]. Since I was reluctant to leave mutt (running
+in an M-x ansi-term anyway) for a pure elisp based solution (they all
+seemed overly complex to set up and unbearably slow with my HUGE imaps
+mailboxes) it helped me a great deal to get org integration working.
+
+I left out the mu part entirely though and since I use sth. like
+(with-current-buffer \"*inbox*\"
+  (term-send-raw-string (concat \"/~i\" message \"\n\n\"))))
+in my .emacs no shell script is needed.[1]
+
+thanks again,
+
+take care,
+
+x
+
+[0] http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2010/02/integrating_Mutt_with_Org-mode/
+[1] this has the obvious disadvantage that I need to have the right
+    mailbox open, but I am fine with that so far.
+"""]]