add non-committed comment, oops

diff --git a/blog/posts/2010/11/h-index_spoofing.mdwn b/blog/posts/2010/11/h-index_spoofing.mdwn
index 3f776f8..4a96407 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/posts/2010/11/h-index_spoofing.mdwn
+++ b/blog/posts/2010/11/h-index_spoofing.mdwn
@@ -21,7 +21,10 @@ retrieved November 25th, 2010.
 Although some people still [don't get it](http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm), the
 bottom line is always the same: you can't rely on a fully automatic method to
 evaluate intelligent entities which are aware of the evaluation method, as
-[**they are very likely to adapt to it**](http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2007/11/5526-stop-the-numbers-game).
+[**they are very likely to adapt to it**](http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2007/11/5526-stop-the-numbers-game). This
+is even more so when the automatic method relies on a
+[data source](http://scholar.google.com) which is not under the control of the
+evaluator(s).
 
 <small>Thanks to [Lucas](http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/blog) for sharing the
 [bibliography entry](http://identi.ca/notice/59233858).<small>