Added a comment: Upstream-Ubuntu link
author81.20.223.30 <81.20.223.30@web>
Sun, 6 Feb 2011 23:33:57 +0000 (00:33 +0100)
committerStefano Zacchiroli <zack@upsilon.cc>
Sun, 6 Feb 2011 23:33:57 +0000 (00:33 +0100)
blog/posts/2011/01/who_the_bloody_hell_cares_about_Debian/comment_7_dfa5a2f40892bbdad7ff72dc6a4ae19b._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/blog/posts/2011/01/who_the_bloody_hell_cares_about_Debian/comment_7_dfa5a2f40892bbdad7ff72dc6a4ae19b._comment b/blog/posts/2011/01/who_the_bloody_hell_cares_about_Debian/comment_7_dfa5a2f40892bbdad7ff72dc6a4ae19b._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..7d5d21c
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ ip="81.20.223.30"
+ claimedauthor="sam"
+ url="http://www.lifl.fr/~hym/"
+ subject="Upstream-Ubuntu link"
+ date="2011-02-06T23:33:56Z"
+ content="""
+Just back from [FOSDEM](http://fosdem.org/2011/), it was a really nice talk!
+
+Afterwards I wondered about the 7% of Ubuntu packages not flowing from debian at all: are these purely non-DFSG-compatible blobs and Ubuntu-really-specific packages (themes, etc. which might even be non-DFSG by the way) or is there some room for improvement to bring some of these packaging efforts to the whole debian-and-children community?
+
+Cheers
+"""]]