Comment moderation
authorzack <zack@web>
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:37:52 +0000 (07:37 +0100)
committerStefano Zacchiroli <zack@upsilon.cc>
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:37:52 +0000 (07:37 +0100)
blog/posts/2011/03/on_the_influence_of_Debian_and_derivatives/comment_3_f4b0119e6bab52f39e96c217508ae49d._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/blog/posts/2011/03/on_the_influence_of_Debian_and_derivatives/comment_3_f4b0119e6bab52f39e96c217508ae49d._comment b/blog/posts/2011/03/on_the_influence_of_Debian_and_derivatives/comment_3_f4b0119e6bab52f39e96c217508ae49d._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..cf80cdf
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ ip="89.233.38.4"
+ claimedauthor="Loris"
+ subject="it's not 128+74 but just 128"
+ date="2011-03-09T14:33:34Z"
+ content="""
+The 128 include the transitively Debian based distros (so typically the 74 based on Ubuntu), Bruce obviously misinterpreted Distrowatch numbers in his article. You can easily figure this out by looking at this list:
+
+http://distrowatch.com/search.php?category=All&origin=All&basedon=Debian&notbasedon=None&desktop=All&architecture=All&status=Active
+
+So it's 39% in total, which is still a lot of course.
+"""]]