Added a comment: re: bad graphs
authorJean-Pierre <Jean-Pierre@web>
Mon, 7 Apr 2014 15:24:19 +0000 (17:24 +0200)
committerStefano Zacchiroli <zack@upsilon.cc>
Mon, 7 Apr 2014 15:24:19 +0000 (17:24 +0200)
blog/posts/2014/04/historical_overview_of_debian_source_code/comment_5_a94e4020f5507a1babb90123dd70cdce._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/blog/posts/2014/04/historical_overview_of_debian_source_code/comment_5_a94e4020f5507a1babb90123dd70cdce._comment b/blog/posts/2014/04/historical_overview_of_debian_source_code/comment_5_a94e4020f5507a1babb90123dd70cdce._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..9c8cd8b
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="Jean-Pierre"
+ ip="195.220.37.18"
+ avatar="http://cdn.libravatar.org/avatar/a926288c737375c3134dd3160c8a3e6f"
+ subject="re: bad graphs"
+ date="2014-04-07T15:24:18Z"
+ content="""
+for eg 'disk usage', on the 20 years graph the x axis legend spans aug2013-apr2014.  Its shape is basically the same as the 1 and 5 years graphs, only with fewer sample points.  Maybe there's something I'm *really* misunderstanding here?
+"""]]