Comment moderation
authorzack <zack@web>
Mon, 10 May 2010 12:34:24 +0000 (14:34 +0200)
committerStefano Zacchiroli <zack@upsilon.cc>
Mon, 10 May 2010 12:34:24 +0000 (14:34 +0200)
blog/posts/2010/05/tickler_file_for_maildir/comment_2_9839d1d8ea286e96aad33d032f253669._comment [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/blog/posts/2010/05/tickler_file_for_maildir/comment_2_9839d1d8ea286e96aad33d032f253669._comment b/blog/posts/2010/05/tickler_file_for_maildir/comment_2_9839d1d8ea286e96aad33d032f253669._comment
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..2686912
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+[[!comment format=mdwn
+ username="zack"
+ subject="re: A tickler needs not be day-oriented"
+ date="2010-05-10T12:34:04Z"
+ content="""
+The original tickler file proposal by Allen spans at most 1 year and has two different granularities:
+day-by-day for the period now + 30 days, month for the rest of the year. My script only support
+day-by-day granularity and in fact I'm considering adding month support.
+
+The reason why I've refraining from doing that thus far, is that I don't postpone for too long delays. Instead of
+doing that I prefer to shelve actions under \"someday/maybe\" as for how I work commitment too far away
+in the future are by no mean certain.
+
+That notwithstanding, I would definitely welcome the integration of this into your mailfilter, as the
+current description of it (at least in Debian) was silent for me on the fact that it does support this
+kind of stuff.
+
+Thanks for your feedback!
+"""]]